When i face
someone talking about high quality or low quality education, I always feel awkward
¿How the education can be good or bad if is a need of the societies educates
their new generations? When I thought it that way I realize that the existence
of poor quality education is a social product more than the good quality
education is. I mean, the obligation of education and the insufficient
resources that the governments intend to the schools where the child of the
poor and the working class goes, produces the poor quality education. Is not
that some schools or some teachers do a good job and others don’t, is the
conditions gave to the educational institutions to work that explains more the
results. Its teachers salaries, quantity of students in a classroom, the infrastructure
and the equipment, the proportion of hours that teachers dedicate to prepare
and do classes, the support of non-teachers professionals like psychologists,
education experts, social workers, and other technical support.
The
existence of poor quality education is because education is not a real priority,
just a minimal obligatory education is needed.
Well, the conditions
of a good education are the first matter, but how we understand quality in
education is another fundamental matter.
In Chile,
the quality of the education is measured by the SIMCE test, that is about
language and mathematical knowledge. This is the only thing that the government
measures to evaluate the quality in primary and secondary education. At the end
of secondary education, the students do the PSU test, which is about language,
mathematical, history and social sciences, and natural sciences knowledge. The
thing that this two tests have in common is that they are only multiple choice
questions tests, this means they understand quality by doing standardized multiple choice questions in about two hours
of the students whole education. I think this is a very limited way of understand
the quality and what the education must be.
To me, the
education is about trespass the culture and the knowledge of the society to a
new generation, so must be integral and at the highest level. Education is also
about solving personal and social problems, because is about teach how to live individually
and social way, so the education must start from real problems of the students
social environment, and the path to solve it, where scientific, social and
technical knowledge is needed, has to be the education.

My boyfriend is a techer. He works in a poor school, at the outsides of the city. I see that is really hard to work with kids when the whole school don´t have resources. The chlidren are sended to school to get the lunch. And they donpt have the conditions nedded to study and learn.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, I don't think that PSU and SIMCE test are goods intruments for measuring the quality in education. In fact is necessary a strengthening from preschool education.
ReplyDelete